Title:EPIC - Electronic Privacy Information Center
Description:The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) focuses public attention on emerging civil liberties, privacy, First Amendment issues and works to promote the Public Voice in decisions concerning the future of the Internet.
Keywords:amicus,amicus curiae,amicus briefs,amicus curiae briefs,friend of the court,friend of the court briefs,EPIC,privacy,civil liberties,court,Supreme Court
Body:
EPIC - Electronic Privacy Information Center
EPIC - Electronic Privacy Information Center
Home
About EPIC
Policy Issues
Bookstore
Press
Events
Support EPIC
Focusing public attention on emerging privacy and civil liberties issues
Latest News - February 9, 2012
Federal Court Grants Accelerated Briefing Schedule in EPIC v. FTC
In response to EPIC's complaint and motion to compel the Federal Trade Commission to enforce a consent order against Google, a federal district court judge has ordered an accelerated briefing schedule. The FTC's Response to the EPIC briefs is due February 17, EPIC's reply is due February 21, 2012. The Court's deadlines reflect Google's imminent, substantial changes to the company's business practices. Google intends to consolidate the personal data of Google users across 60 services on March 1. EPIC contends that these changes constitute a violation of the consent order with the Federal Trade Commission. For more information, see EPIC v. FTC (Google Consent Order).
Posted on February 9, 2012 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Department of Homeland Security Disregards Public Comments and Issues Final Rule that Undermines Traveler Privacy Rights
The U.S. Customs and Border Protection, a component within the Department of Homeland Security, issued a final rule approving Global Entry, a traveler screening program, despite the substantial privacy and security risks brought to the agency's attention. Under the Global Entry program, the CBP collects detailed personal information, including social security numbers and biometric information, that should be subject to Privacy Act safeguards. However, the agency rejected EPIC's recommendations that it comply with the Privacy Act by limiting the distribution of information to only those that need the information for screening purposes. In EPIC's comments, EPIC also noted that CBP violated federal law by not conducting a Privacy Impact Assessment before implementing the new Global Entry program. For more information, see: EPIC: Global Entry.
Posted on February 8, 2012 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
FAA Legislation Prompts Agency to Assess Safety of Drones in US Airspace
In the Re-Authorization Bill for the Federal Aviation Administration, Congress has required the agency to develop rules governing the operation of drones within U.S. National Airspace. Currently, the only barriers to operation of unmanned aircraft are procedural requirements that oblige drone operators to obtain operation certificates. The FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012 requires the agency to conduct a public rule-making that will assess public safety concerns, licensing requirements, flight standards, and air traffic requirements. The FAA Secretary will also undertake safety studies and develop standards for "Safe Operation" in US airspace. However, the legislation does not consider the need to assess the privacy risks of the deployment of drones in US airspace. For more information, see EPIC: Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and Drones.
Posted on February 8, 2012 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
EPIC Sues Federal Trade Commission to Enforce Google Consent Order
EPIC today filed a Complaint and a Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction in Federal District Court in Washington, DC. EPIC is seeking to compel the Federal Trade Commission to act prior to March 1, when Google plans to make changes in its terms of service that will make it possible for the company to combine user data without user consent. EPIC alleges that this change in business practice is in clear violation of the consent order that Google entered into on October 13, 2011. The consent order arises from a complaint that EPIC brought to the Commission in February, 2010 concerning Google Buzz and a similar attempt by Google to combine user data without user consent. For more information, see EPIC - In re Google Buzz, FTC - "FTC Charges Deceptive Privacy Practices in Google's Rollout of Its Buzz Social Network."
Posted on February 8, 2012 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Congress to Hold Hearing on Department of Homeland Security Social Network Monitoring
On February 16, 2012, the House Committee on Homeland Security will hold a hearing on "DHS Monitoring of Social Networking and Media: Enhancing Intelligence Gathering and Ensuring Privacy." The hearing was called after EPIC obtained nearly 300 pages of documents, as a result of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit, detailing the Department of Homeland Security's monitoring of social networks and media organizations. The documents included guidelines from DHS instructing General Dynamics to monitor for media reports that "reflect adversely" on the agency or the federal government. For more information see: EPIC v. Department of Homeland Security: Media Monitoring.
Posted on February 6, 2012 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Google Backs Off Privacy Policy Change for Federal Government
In response to growing concern about the impact of Google's proposed policy change on user privacy and cloud-computing services, the company said that its planned privacy changes will not apply to US federal agencies. A report from Safegov.org "Google #8217;s New Privacy Policy Is Unacceptable and Jeopardizes Government Information in the Cloud" recommended that "Google immediately suspend the application of its new privacy policy to Google Apps For Government users." Google told POLITICO's Morning Tech "cloud contracts are crafted with 'narrow, specific obligations' on how data can be used and stored. And those data requirements in the cloud contracts trump the company's standard privacy policy."
Posted on February 3, 2012 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Google Policy Change Triggers EU Privacy Revolt
Leading privacy officials in Europe have asked Google "for a pause" in the company's planned consolidation of user data "in the interests of ensuring that there can be no misunderstanding about Google's commitments to the information rights of their users and EU citizens. . ." EU Commissioner Vivian Reding (@VivianeRedingEU) has expressed support, tweeting "Good that Europe's data protection authorities are ensuring @Google's new privacy policy complies with EU law." EPIC has urged the United States to begin the process of ratification of Council of Europe Privacy Convention, which would establish global standards for privacy protection.
Posted on February 3, 2012 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
EPIC Seeks Public Release of Google's Privacy Report
EPIC has filed a Freedom of Information Act request with the Federal Trade Commission for the Privacy Report that Google was recently required to submit to the agency. The Commission had previously investigated Google after EPIC filed a complaint regarding Google's Buzz product, which transformed private user contacts into publicly available social network data. Last fall the Commission reached a settlement with Google and, as a result, the company is subject to a consent order that requires it to file regular reports with the Commission. EPIC has requested that Google's first report, filed on January 26, 2012, be released to the public. Because of Google's plan to change its business practice on March 1, 2012, EPIC has asked the FTC to expedite the disclosure of the report. For more information see EPIC: In re Google Buzz.
Posted on February 1, 2012 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
EPIC Calls for Moratorium on Facial Recognition Technology
In detailed comments to the Federal Trade Commission, EPIC today recommended the suspension of facial recognition technology deployment until adequate safeguards and privacy standards are established. EPIC said that facial recognition is often used by strangers to determine a person's actual identity and that this poses a risk to privacy and personal security. EPIC also noted that some companies have adopted techniques that are more favorable to privacy as they allow users to control the image database while others undermine privacy, as the image database is centrally maintained. EPIC previously submitted a complaint to the FTC about Facebook's use of facial recognition technology to build a secret database of users' biometric data and allowing the company to automatically tag users in photos. The comments follow an FTC workshop exploring the privacy and security issues raised of facial recognition technology. For more information, see EPIC: Federal Trade Commission, EPIC: Face Recognition, and EPIC: Facebook and Face Recognition.
Posted on February 1, 2012 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
EPIC to Recommend Changes to Video Privacy Law
At a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, EPIC Executive Director Marc Rotenberg is expected to make several recommendations to Congress about how to update and modernize the Video Privacy Protection Act, a law passed by Congress in 1988. Among the changes recommended, EPIC will propose that Congress make clear that the law covers all video service providers (including Netflix), allow users to inspect the information that video providers collect about them as well as the algorithms that are used to recommend selections, treat IP addresses and user IDs as "personally identifiable information," inflation-adjust the damages provision, and require companies to encrypt the data collected on users. For more information, see EPIC Video Privacy Protection.
Posted on January 30, 2012 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
EPIC Expresses Support for International Privacy Convention
Speaking this week at the Computers, Privacy and Data Protection conference, EPIC President Marc Rotenberg expressed support for the Council of Europe Privacy Convention. Two years ago, twenty-nine members of the of the EPIC Advisory Board, experts in privacy law and technology, sent a letter to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to urge that the United States begin the process of ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on Privacy. They wrote, "privacy is a fundamental human right. In the 21st century, it may become one of the most critical human rights of all." Speaking in Brussels, Mr. Rotenberg reiterated EPIC's support for the Convention and also called attention to recent changes that modernize and update the international privacy framework.
Posted on January 27, 2012 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Congress Seeks Answers on Google #8217;s Plans for Data Consolidation
Eight members of Congress wrote to Google asking the company to explain the "steps [that] are being taken to ensure the protection of consumers' privacy rights." The letter follows Google's announcement that it would begin combining data gathered on consumers of over 60 Google products and services, including Gmail, Google+, Youtube, and the Android mobile operating system. The members' letter includes 11 specific questions ranging from the ways in which Google collects information to the specific consequences for Android phone users. In 2010, EPIC, along with other privacy groups, wrote a letter to Google about the company's decision to combine user data among 12 Google services. The groups warned that the practical effect would be to reduce privacy protection for users of Google services. For more information, see EPIC: In re: Google Buzz and EPIC: Google search.
Posted on January 27, 2012 | Permalink
Share this post: del.icio.us | digg | Linked In | Technorati | Twitter | Facebook
Top News Archive
Search epic.org
Donate to EPIC
p
EPIC 2012 Brochure (pdf)
Connect with EPIC
Subscribe to Alerts
Subscribe to the EPIC Alert
Previous EPIC Alerts
Internet Privacy Infographic
Infographic by frugaldad.com
Hot Policy Issues
Body Scanners
Cloud Computing
Childrens' Online Privacy
DHS Privacy Office
EU Data Protection Directive
Facebook
Facebook Facial Recognition
FAST Project
FBI Watchlist
Fusion Centers
Google Street View
Intelligence Oversight Board
Locational Privacy
Medical Record Privacy
National ID
NSTIC
Open Government
PATRIOT Act
Privacy Convention
Re-identification
Search Engine Privacy
Secure Communities
Smart Grid
Social Networking Privacy
Voter Photo ID
EPIC Publications
Litigation Under the Federal Open Government Laws 2010
More EPIC Publications...
EPIC Bookstore Feature
I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did: Social Networks and the Death of Privacy
More EPIC Publications...
Resources
EPIC Alert [subscribe]
EPIC Bookstore
EPIC Events
EPIC Press Releases
EPIC Privacy Tools
EPIC Reports
Former Secrets (FOIA)
Privacy Resources
About EPIC
About EPIC
Support EPIC
Advisory Board
Board and Staff
EPIC Fellowships/IPIOP Clerkships
Litigation Docket
Privacy Policy
Affiliated Sites
EPIC Brochure (pdf)
____________________
Coalitions
Global Internet Liberty Campaign
In Defense of Freedom
Internet Free Expression Alliance
National Comm. for Voting Integrity
On the Identity Trail
Privacy Coalition
Privacy International
The Privacy Site
The Public Voice
Security Framework Project
Trans Atlantic Consumer Dialogue
FOIA Documents
EPIC FOIA Notes
EPIC FOIA Note #20: Government Transparency
FOIA Gallery 2011
FOIA Notes
EPIC Former Secrets
Spotlight on Surveillance
Proposed "Enhanced" Licenses are Costly to Security and Privacy
Spotlight on Surveillance Archive
Privacy Report Card
p
View the EPIC 2010 Report Card here.
View the press release here.
EPIC 2009 Report Card
Privacy Google Books
Google Books Settlement Privacy
Google Books Policy
Google Books Litigation
Take Action
____________________
Visit International Privacy Day's Facebook Page
Upcoming Events
#PrivChat
Amie Stepanovich
EPIC National Security Counsel
February 14, 2012
More EPIC Events...
Recent EPIC Events
The Public Voice Conference:"Privacy is Freedom"
The Public Voice
Mexico City
October 31, 2011
____________________
EPIC Champion of Freedom Awards
____________________
Computers Freedom Privacy 2011: The Future is Now
Facebook Page
CFP 2011 Brochure
Stop Body Scanners
EPIC has filed a lawsuit to suspend the deployment of body scanners at US airports, pending an independent review.
Details on EPIC v. DHS
EPIC Body Scanner Incident Report
EPIC's Body Scanner Facebook Page
Privacy Video
Hartmann: FBI's next gen ID roll out...will you be in the database?
Previous Video Archive...
EPIC in the News
Privacy group sues FTC to stop new Google privacy policyLos Angeles TimesFebruary 8, 2012
____________________
Google Addresses EU Privacy Concerns with a 3-page LetterITProPortalFebruary 8, 2012
More EPIC in the News...
EPIC Docket Highlights
EPIC Cases
EPIC FOIA Cases
EPIC v. DHS (FOIA, Body Scanners)
EPIC v. DHS (Body Scanner Radiation Risks)
EPIC v. DOD (TIA/Fee Waiver)
EPIC v. DOJ (FOIA, Body Scanners)
EPIC v. DOJ (IOB reports)
EPIC v. DOJ (NSA Surveillance)
EPIC v. FTC (Conflict of Interest)
EPIC v. NSA (Cybersecurity)
EPIC v. NSA (Google Relationship)
EPIC v. TSA (Body Scanner Software Modifications)
EPIC v. VSP (Fusion Centers)
Other EPIC Cases
EPIC v. DHS (Emergency Stay, Body Scanners)
EPIC FTC Complaint (Google)
EPIC FTC Complaint (Phone Records)
Gonzales v. ACLU (NSLs)
In re Facebook (Settings)
In re Facebook II (Settings)
In re Google (Buzz)
In re Google (Cloud Computing)
EPIC Amicus Briefs:
Recent EPIC Briefs
Chicago Tribune v. Univ. of Illinois (FERPA)
Doe v. Luzerne County (Informational Privacy)
FAA v. Cooper (Privacy Act)
First American v. Edwards (Statutory Damages)
In re Google Street View (Wiretap Act)
US v. Jones (GPS Tracking)
US v. Pool (DNA)
Other EPIC Briefs
ACLU v. DOD (Secrecy)
BATF v. Chicago (FOIA)
Bunnell v. MPAA (Wiretap)
City of Ontario v. Quon (Txt Messages)
Commonwealth v. Connolly (GPS Tracking)
Crawford v. Marion County (Voter ID)
Doe v. Chao (Privacy Act)
Doe v. Reed (Petition Signatures)
FCC v. AT T (FOIA)
Flores-Figueroa v. US (ID Theft)
G.D. v. Kenny (Expungement)
Gilmore v. Ashcroft (Secrecy)
Gonzales v. Doe (Wiretap)
Google Books Settlement
Harris v. Blockbuster (Facebook Privacy)
Hepting v. AT amp;T (Wiretap)
Herring v. US (Errors in databases)
Hiibel v. Nevada (Anonymity)
IMS Health v. Ayotte (Medical privacy)
IMS Health v. Sorrell (Medical Privacy)
Kehoe v. Fidelity Bank (Consumer privacy)
Kohler v. Englade (DNA)
NASA v. Nelson (Employee Privacy)
NCTA v. FCC (Phone records privacy)
New Jersey v. Reid (ISP subscriber privacy)
Ostergren v. McDonnell (Identity Theft)
Peterson v. NTIA (WHOIS data)
Reno v. Condon (DPPA)
SEC v. Galleon (Wiretapping)
Smith v. Doe (Megans Law)
Tolentino v. New York (Police Searches)
US v. Councilman (Wiretap)
US v. Kincade (DNA)
Watchtower Bible v. Stratton (Anonymity)
Privacy Campaigns
EPIC's 2010 E-Deceptive Campaign Practices Report
____________________
____________________
Internet Privacy Infographic
____________________
Electronic Privacy Information Center | 1718 Connecticut Ave. NW Washington, DC 20009 | More info
